Category Archives: Uncategorized

CFP “After Emory”

Bill Gaskins and Kirstin Buick, of Cornell and the University of New Mexico respectively, are soliciting abstracts for a panel at next year’s College Art Association conference.

After Emory: Redefining Art and Art History in the American University

Bill Gaskins, Cornell University; and Kirsten Buick, University of New Mexico. Email: and
In the fall of 2012 the visual arts department at Emory University was terminated as an academic unit. The department was assessed as no longer representative of Emory’s core mission. For the art departments left standing, and the institutions that house them, this is a moment for a robust public discussion about the future of art and art history in the American university. This session will not readjudicate the decision made by Emory but rather focus on the external challenges, internal dynamics, and critical questions about the prudence, relevance, and sustainability of fine art as an academic project in the twenty-first century. We are calling for solution-themed papers from studio and art history faculty, administrators, alumni, and contributors from related disciplines.

Here’s the original call (it’s on page 8). (Just what does “Emory” signify to the largest organization of art scholars in the U.S.? Well, a cursory search of journals and conferences brings up “After Humanism,” “After the World,” “After Sex,” “After the Postsecular,” “After Life”–you get the idea.)

Speaking of Visual Arts, don’t forget to check out “Cross Reference,” the final exhibition in our beautiful Visual Arts Building, before it closes on April 5.

Tagged ,

Questions for James Wagner

Tonight the Emory Wheel is hosting an “Open Forum” with President Wagner. We are grateful for the Wheel’s organizing this opportunity. Here are our questions for the President. We have a lot, but then again, although an hour isn’t nearly enough time to decisively deal with the issues of program cuts, race, sexual assault, his essay, governance, and advocacy for the liberal arts, we’re going his desire for questions at face value and put all of these out there in good faith.

On Student Representation:

Toward more active and meaningful student participation in the running of the university, do you support an elected student representative on the Board of Trustees?

The outcome of the recent Laney Graduate Student vote indicates that graduate student concerns are not being addressed at Emory. Would you support the unionization of Graduate Students at Emory, and how would you engage with an organized body representing Laney Graduate student interests going forward?

Do you endorse student representatives on faculty search committees, as occurs in many other schools?

There were no student representatives in the recent search for a new Provost or in the search for a Dean for the College in 2009-2010.  Do you endorse student representatives on administrative search committees in the future?  Do you endorse student representation on the search committee to choose your successor, whenever that search should come?

Do you support student participation in the writing of each department’s annual academic planning documents, and do you support student participation in the academic planning meetings that the College Office holds with each department?

Do you endorse student-led initiatives concerning curriculum planning, and if so, what mechanisms can the College introduce to solicit and integrate such initiatives?

On the Recent Votes:

President Wagner, 40% of voting college faculty and 68% of voting Laney students just indicated that they do not have confidence in you.  Why do you think so many people in the Emory community don’t have confidence in you, and what will you be doing to regain their support?

Graduate students in the liberal arts and sciences often go on to pursue jobs in universities, colleges, and other places of higher learning. Are you concerned that the current governance of Emory is being brought into question by the next generation of academics and scholars? Does your vision of Emory’s future appropriately take into account the voices of future academy leaders?

Would you agree with the following statement:  “In addition to being students, undergraduates at Emory College should also be considered major funders of the university by virtue of the tuition we pay through heavy borrowing at our own risk”––?

Would you agree to an hour’s debate with a student opponent of the cuts, in an open forum before the close of the current semester?

About Dissent on Campus:

In your now-famous 3/5 Compromise column, you write:  “Through debate, through questioning, through experimentation, we aim to enlarge the sphere of knowledge and refine the exercise of wisdom, to do the hard work of opening others’ minds and keeping our own minds open to possibilities.”  Please describe your view of this year’s student-driven dissent around the issue of the cuts in connection with this published statement of yours.

Nearly two years ago, at the Open Forum following the arrests of seven students on the Quad for peaceful dissent, faculty fervently expressed their serious concern over your disregard of students’ courageous inquiry into Emory’s contracting policies and your bypassing of avenues of shared governance in the decision to arrest and pursue criminal charges against students. You apologized and the community moved on, trusting that you had learned something from those events. Over this past year, we again witnessed your disregard of students’ concerns about the departmental cuts and how you bypassed shared governance and violated university bylaws in carrying out those cuts. You have proven to us that you are good at apologizing, but not at learning. Why should we trust that you will act any differently this third time around? Or is there simply, in your own words, more of this to come?

President Wagner, at the end of a meeting with you in December to negotiate the possible reversal of the cuts, you stated that you would like to work with students, but not students like those of us at the meeting. Did you mean you would not work with the seven students at the meeting, or the 150 who occupied the administration building to demand reversal of the cuts?

On Race:

President Wagner, we are very encouraged by your renewed interest in diversity, equity, and social justice. I would like to know how your cabinet, which is 90% white and 70% male, and the Board of Trustees, which is 88% white and 76% male, are working to ensure equity and social justice for the lowest paid workers on campus – the non-managerial contract labor force – which is nearly 80% Black or Latino/a. Other than the model of ideal compromise and governance you proposed in your recent essay – in which white men make decisions that maintain control over the labor of black human beings and ensure continued profits – what specific policies or compromises do you envision that will make social justice a reality for these workers?

Dean Forman has been quoted in an interview with NPR / WABE as saying that the SRC’s Factsheet about race and the cuts was “damaging.” Do you agree? The SRC factsheet on Race and the Cuts raised questions that were officially submitted to the administration and to you personally multiple times. Were those questions only damaging when they circulated within the community, or did they just become damaging when they reached outside media? Why has your administration yet to release a researched, written reply the fact sheet?

On Race and Sexual Assault:

How many of the previous ten State of Race addresses have you been to?  Have you been SAPA trained?  Have you done the office of LGBT life Safe Spaces training?

On Advocacy for the Liberal Arts and Program Cuts:

What parts of the process for the fall department cuts were flawed and what changes would you like to see the next time Emory is considering eliminating departments?

You are on the record as telling the Emory College faculty in your address to them in March 2012, “we will not cut our way to eminence.”  Can you confirm that there will be no further cuts to liberal arts programs in the effort to enhance Emory’s academic stature?

President Wagner, I was at a meeting with you in December as a student representative against the cuts. At that meeting, you stated that there was “more of this to come”. Could you elaborate?

We know that students take the time to express a variety of opinions on our educational experience in the course evaluations that we fill out for each course we take.  Our responses are both statistical and narrative. And yet it is normal that we receive no response whatsoever to the views we express.  How are students to know that our opinions are being taken into consideration?  Do you endorse regular meetings between chairs and groups of majors in the College to discuss the quality and effectiveness of teaching?

What role should clearly expressed student demand for courses of study play in academic planning?  For example, the Visual Arts department––whose elimination from Emory you have endorsed––has for many years had long wait lists owing to its unique theory-practice curriculum, and has never been given the resources to teach the number of classes students wish to take.  Since the cuts were announced last September, wait lists for that department have increased even more, sometimes topping 100.  Similar stories can be told about all the cut departments.  Do you see students as misguided in wishing to take courses in disciplines you see as so lacking in value that you authorized their removal from Emory?  Would you say that you know better than students what skills are important to take from our time and investment in Emory?

On Leading Emory:

Do you think Emory’s administrator to faculty ratio is too high? Why or why not?

Are there other university presidents you draw inspiration from? Could you explain why?

In February, a representative from Bain & Company described how administrative bloat is plaguing American universities and impeding cash flow. Are you planning on hiring Bain as a consultant for Emory?

You have stated several times that you view university governance as a republic, not a democracy. Going forward, do you plan any initiative to ensure appropriate representation of faculty, staff, and students in future management decisions as befits a republican model?

Grad students: have you voted yet?

The link for voting is, and the polls close at 8:30 tonight.

Mael and Kwame encouraging grad students to vote outside the library


SRC’s No Confidence flyer

No Confidence flyer 4/10

Edited 4/11 to add references:

Manipulation of student data: New York Times 23 Dec. 2012, “Poor students struggle…” (Angelica’s story)

Targeted censorship: especially against Students and Workers in Solidarity

Faking admissions data: widely reported

Tagged ,


Fighting institutional monotony with creative repetition.

Tagged ,

Symposium schedule is up!

We’re thrilled by the range of speakers, performers and artists who have submitted their research, experiences in activism, and artwork for the symposium this Monday evening. Check out the schedule and the very impressive participant biographies!

To get yourself in the mood, join us for the ceremonial Yellow Brick Road walk from the quad to the VAB, beginning at 4:00. If you’re coming on your own, the visual arts department has provided walking/driving directions to the Visual Arts Building, at 700 Peavine Creek Dr. Peavine Creek intersects with Eagle Row (fraternity and sorority row) and is on on The Loop and D/DX shuttle bus routes. The most reliable parking lot is Peavine Deck, at 29 Eagle Row. Finally, if you require assistance getting to the VAB, please let us know as soon as possible ( The building itself is wheelchair accessible.

Thanks to our sponsors, the symposium will include a light dinner from Alon’s and wine and beer for those 21+. We’ve heard this is a draw for grad students.

Symposium poster!

SRC Symposium flyer
Thanks to Laura Hunt for another fabulous poster. The Re-Visioning Emory symposium, in case you missed it, is happening next Monday, April 8, at 4:30 in the Visual Arts Building. Keep an eye on our Symposium page for further updates. Right now, our biggest challenge is making sure all the provocative, challenging, and ever so eminent speakers can fit into one evening program.

Tagged ,

Open letter from the English Dept.

Twenty-four tenured and senior professors in the English department have released a letter condemning President Wagner’s racist editorial in the Emory Magazine. They condemn Wagner’s words as “indefensible” and call on the Board of Trustees to respond

3.6.13.English Dept Open Letter 3.6.13.English Dept Open Letter-signatures











Also duly noted:

In the short term, we anticipate adverse consequences for the recruitment of faculty members and top-tier students. Serious academics will no doubt pause to question whether Emory is a suitable environment in which to pursue liberal arts training that promotes respect based on informed critical reasoning.
During this graduate admissions season, we have had to write to our admitted students to reassure them that President Wagner’s article in no way reflects our values, nor should it affect their training. Indeed, we have heard back from many of them that the article has been on their minds as they deliberate about whether to come to Emory rather than to accept other, highly competitive offers.

We thank you for your way with words and your integrity in exercising the “responsibilities” that come with tenure. We also express shame at the culture–one not unique to Emory–where junior faculty are led to believe speaking out may put their jobs on the line.

Tagged , , , , , ,